Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)  (Read 8974 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Roj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 361
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org/modules/mylinks/visit.php?lid=247
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« on: February 29, 2004, 07:31:02 AM »
To be fair. WindowsXP has more than a few people doing the programming while the Amiga has just a tad bit less.

I would hope that with all the people programming for it that it would have an extremely long list of features that the more neglected systems lack. Is it enough to make me feel like I need all of it (or any of it)?

Nuh uh. Somehow I manage to get my work done without it. :juggler:
I sold my Amiga for a small fortune, but a part of my soul went with it.
 

Offline Roj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 361
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org/modules/mylinks/visit.php?lid=247
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #1 on: February 29, 2004, 09:45:02 AM »
Essentially what you're saying is I should toss the systems that work very well for the work I do simply because everyone else uses Windows.

The first big game for the Amiga was Lemmings, wasn't it? I learned everything I need to know by playing Lemmings. :lol:

I do have a PC, I do run WindowsXP on it when I need to, and WindowsXP does have quite a list of features that my other OSs don't. However, I don't use Windows for my work unless I'm absolutely pushed into a corner to do so. I have other systems that allow the work to flow much more smoothly. For example, very frequently I need to access a window that's behind another window without moving it forward. I'm sure Windows has a way to turn off "always move my window to the front when I do anything more than look at it" somewhere, but even with that off, Windows has a climsiness to it that I just can't get all cozy with. Frequently, programs I run like to rearrange my windows without my input. I have a specific order I like to keep my work windows in, and Windows takes it upon itself to move and resize them at its whim. I can probably dig around and find the "don't rearrange my windows" setting, but I just can't be bothered to. After that, we have the "let's select the entire line and put the cursor at the end on single-click" feature. That one's fun too. The "whoops, you clicked close when you meant to click minimize" attraction has caught me a few times when I catch late-night, dreary-eye syndrome. The "resize the window at any edge" feature just about drives me nuts, and there are several more little things that just remind me that windows isn't there yet. It might be in a few more releases, but from what I'm hearing I'll be steering clear of those as well. Meanwhile, I'll be digging even deeper into the systems that do work well for me.

Oh yeah, my favorite one: I was working on a resume for a friend a few years back, and I used the word "focussed". Silly me, I used MerriamWebster.com to spell-check. Now you'd think that would be perfectly acceptable and everything would turn out fine. Well, unfortunately, the rest of the office world uses Microsoft Word now as the official English spell-checking reference, and since Microsoft Word rejected the properly spelled "focussed", the interviewer noted the "misspelling," the job was given to someone else (for whatever reason) and I got a face full of what-for until I proved that the dictionary, the real dictionary, says I really do know how to spell.

So, what do I use Windows for? As time permits, MajorMud, GTA Vice City and Warcraft III, along with a few other games that also won't let me choose what OS to run them on, and that's about as far as I'm willing to go with it.
I sold my Amiga for a small fortune, but a part of my soul went with it.
 

Offline Roj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 361
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org/modules/mylinks/visit.php?lid=247
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #2 on: February 29, 2004, 10:19:00 AM »
Quote
Apparently efficient enough to run WinUAE...


...barely, and I mean just barely on a 2Ghz processor. Everything else I multitask with WinUAE crawls to a standstill, and in some cases that'll take money off my paycheck.

Really, on 1GHz + processors, any OS should have enough efficiency to run UAE. I'd really worry about the ones that didn't.
I sold my Amiga for a small fortune, but a part of my soul went with it.
 

Offline Roj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 361
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org/modules/mylinks/visit.php?lid=247
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #3 on: February 29, 2004, 09:32:55 PM »
Quote
Sorry but today so called true Amigans seem to be WinUAE users. Nothing wrong in that, but Windows can't be that bad then.


Guess again, if only just for me.

Amiga4000 Power Tower, 2MB Chip - 16MB Fast
CyberStormPPC 68060/60MHz 604e/233MHz 128MB
CyberVisionPPC Graphics, Toccata Audio
PFS3, Algor USB, GVP I/O Extender
Canon BJC 250, Plextor CDRW
Samsung 171v Flatscreen Monitor
AmigaOS 3.9 BB2
I sold my Amiga for a small fortune, but a part of my soul went with it.
 

Offline Roj

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 361
    • Show all replies
    • http://amiga.org/modules/mylinks/visit.php?lid=247
Re: Amiga os3.9 vs Windows XP (ram usage)
« Reply #4 on: February 29, 2004, 09:52:28 PM »
Quote
You can make comparisons how much less IBrowse needs than IE, but then IE can do CSS and Java and everything else.


Somehow I doubt that IBrowse with CSS and decent enough plugin capability to allow for things like Java "and everything else" will be anywhere near the size of IE. I could be wrong, but I'd have to see it before I believed it.
I sold my Amiga for a small fortune, but a part of my soul went with it.