Does software actually qualify for Copyright protections? Sometimes I wonder why a word processor, clearly used as a tool to create other works, falls into the same category as the works it is used to create. The icons and other imagery, in their own individual cases, could fall under Copyright protections, but to declare the entire package an expression or work of art just doesn't fit. It's similar to a company sticking their logo on a hammer and declaring that no other hammers may be created by any other persons.
