Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM  (Read 13378 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sig999

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 153
    • Show all replies
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« on: December 02, 2008, 06:39:15 PM »
on topic - the SAM looks interesting, and I wish I had the cash in the coffers atm to order one - past screenshots I've not seen AOS-4 running, and my main gripe 'oh how bloody typical' thought when it came out was that you couldn't buy a machine to run it on anymore...
The second 'eyeroll' came with the lawsuit crapola 'blood hell... it's like AmithlonII!' I thought..
So Kudos to Hyperion and Acube! I'll hopefully be ordering one next year (although I don't think I could be faulted for adding a 'when both the OS and Hardware are in stock' after the last decade of Amiga History).

I look forward to folks getting the kit posting reviews...


Off topic - wha?  We've decended to 'what is an Amiga' and promoting old tech holdovers as 'features' and 'other OS non-sequiturs' pretty early!

When my 2000 started playing up last month I put it on hold while waiting for decent priced replacements to appear on Ebay and fired up 'old crappy' and dug up the variety of 'software solutions' from years gone by...

Personally I don't like running WinUae for much - nothing against it, just doesn't give me the right 'feel' for getting stuff done or tinkering with software... I prefer said things on a seperate system.. booting up and running...

Back in the day I ran Amithlon on it - but I've replaced some hardware and now its a bear to setup ... well MORE of a bear than initially... so I checked out XAmiga - (cut down gentoo linux running E-UAE)...

Emulation wise - was a LOT easier to access the internet and my other computers than either the 2000 with OS3.1 OR Amithlon with 3.9.... can't speak for 4.0 (as I said - I've not seen it - hopefully it's better than these 2). I uncommented a line in a config file - rebooted.. that was it.

To date I've had NO problem with either Ibrowse or Aweb.. dunno where the 'emulation can't access the web' thingy came from - I've yet to see any sign of that..

The clincher I guess is the shutdown (and I laughed when I saw what the debate had come down to)...

It takes me LESS time to turn off my Xamiga system than it does to turn off my A2000.

Seriously... and thats not 'turning off and walking away' thats from 'I think I'll turn this off' to 'Powered Down'.

It takes 3 seconds to powerdown that system from hitting ctrl-alt-delete (cut down system don't need much cleanup).

For giggles I timed how long it took me to reach around and flip the switch on the back of my A2000.... NOT INCLUDING TURNING OFF THE MONITOR (which the other system does as well).... 5 seconds.

Dunno - when it comes down to debating the virtues of the powerbutton I think anything productive has long flown out the window.
 

Offline Sig999

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Posts: 153
    • Show all replies
Re: AROS vs traditional Amiga vs SAM
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2008, 08:11:02 PM »
@gebrochen

I think you missed the point - the point not being 'speed races' to shut off our computer, but to basically point out that your comments on the length needed to shut down an emulated system were incorrect.

It takes me around the same amount of time to shut down an emulated system as it does to turn of an original A2000.

....personally, as I mentioned in my other post - when your main point of discussion is how fast you can turn it off (because we all know how those valuable seconds add up in the day!) - the 'debate' is seriously scraping the bottom of the barrel.

Of the many virtues the machine still holds (OS3.9 on that old system runs much smoother and better than windows xp did - also the programs... even bloaty ones - are much smaller) - how fast I can turn it off wouldn't be ranked in the top 10.

Then again - the Amiga has always been really good at turning off!  Even all by itself! (guru anyone?) haha