Karlos wrote:
KennyR wrote:
Blobrana wrote:
twins are clones remember...
No they aren't. Different fingerprints and everything.
They are clones in the sense that they are genetically identical. However, its a common misconception that identical genes equates identical copy, which as you point out is not true. A great many natural structures in the body are fractal in nature and as such will differ slightly thanks to the influence of chaos as they grow and develop.
A perfect genetic clone of oneself would be no closer than one's own identical twin.
There is also evidence to suggest that there is some biological record of age that is not yet fully understood. Cloned animals have exhibited very rapid ageing effects that whould physically put them in a similar condition to the adult they were cloned from (Dolly the sheep was a classic example here).
That's facinating, it would be incredible if scientists could figure out how to "stop that clock" so to speak. It would be the bee's knees to implement a biological aging stasis at 29 years of age.
I'd change my name to Lazarus Long and wear a kilt with a gun strapped to my inner thigh. :-P