Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: 'openamiga' is a joke!  (Read 5174 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline iamaboringpersonTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show all replies
'openamiga' is a joke!
« on: June 28, 2003, 03:08:35 AM »
LMFAO!!
here

check out the so called min. specs:

Kernel:
AmigaOS 3.1 compatible
2D Graphics:
CGX v4 compatible
3D Graphics:
MESA 5.5
Audio:
AHI 5.5
Networking:
BSDSocket compatible
Media Layer:
SDL 1.2
GUI Tool Kit:
MUI 3.8 compatible
Executable File Format:
ELF
C compiler:
GCC
Scripting:
A/REXX compatible

basically, a couple of dudes have rushed together some favorite programs of theirs and proclaimed this to be a standard
what a joke!

and what if i dont use GCC or dont have it installed? or if i prefer reaction or some other gui kit to MUI? my OS, or software, or ME or whatever is deemed 'uncomplient with the openamiga specifications'?? LOL!
what a joke
anybody can start up a web site, put a few old amiga favorites down - and call it a standard
 

Offline iamaboringpersonTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show all replies
Re: 'openamiga' is a joke!
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2003, 03:20:17 AM »
kenny, who's to tell me which programs on my hard drive are standard and which are not??

why cant individuals/companies decide for them selves?



 :-o i might just start up another web site called 'closedamiga.org' and list a whole bunch of crap that I call standard :crazy:
 

Offline iamaboringpersonTopic starter

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jun 2002
  • Posts: 5744
    • Show all replies
Re: 'openamiga' is a joke!
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2003, 03:52:21 AM »
k, when i first heard about it, i thought its probably whats needed, its a good idea,
and it probably is a good idea

but today i saw a list(probably rather quickly put together) of third party apps that some mug thought should be included

the way to create a standard is to begin by outlineing the general requirements(by a broad range of developers and users)
this type of thing isnt even visible on this site
its hard to see how this is going to be a proper and accepted standard: "ok we need this, this, this, and this..."

second to the generalized requirements(which are not to be specifics of particular software), should be the sort of functions and libraries that are required
e.g.
audio support:
-should have the same function & library names as used in AHI
-should fit in with library abc... etc...
blah blah blah...
2d graphics:
-need for compatability with old 8bit bitplane software, with structures as specified in ARKRM's compatable with graphics.library
-chunky graphics support
-16/24 bit support
...

then the specific libraries can be workout(or worked on later)

if its source level compatability that matters, worry about the functions and structures etc...
so that the libraries and the applications can be made to fit together
so when some new mob comes along to produce an amiga os type os instead of using cybergraphics they might want their own software
but they can still write their own graphics libraries, they can then be made to the same basic standards
but specific software/apps/libraries dont have to be included

the GUI side of it i dont know about... too many people have their own ideas as to which set of libraries to use
IMO it should all be OOP and based on BOOPSI
so that all the classes can be intermixed/ added to