Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Workbench backgrounds - some questions  (Read 5126 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Daedalus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 893
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.robthenerd.com
Re: Workbench backgrounds - some questions
« on: December 20, 2011, 11:37:41 PM »
What happens is that, as the image is decoded, it is mapped to the existing "locked" pens, that is, the ones Workbench is already using and the ones in the palette editor. Any colours other than those it needs are taken from the remaining unlocked pens, which are altered to suit and then locked. The precision of these mappings can be adjusted, poor precision will leave more pens free for other purposes, but doesn't look as good. I should ask here, what version of the OS are you using? Because 3.9 has much better options for the background than 3.1.

As for image formats, anything you have a datatype for you can use, but I strongly suggest IFF as it doesn't need any translation. Scaling the image to your screen resolution and pre-mapping the colours will greatly reduce the time taken to display the image. Photoshop does export IFF IIRC, but I recommend Personal Paint for these things, since it's so much better suited to dealing with indexed colours, and can remap, resize and dither easily for the best results.
Engineers do it with precision
--
http://www.robthenerd.com
 

Offline Daedalus

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 893
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.robthenerd.com
Re: Workbench backgrounds - some questions
« Reply #1 on: December 21, 2011, 10:07:53 AM »
I'm not familiar with Photoshop's settings for IFF (yeah, ILBM) saving, but saving as the correct bit depth will be important for loading speed and keeping some pens free. I don't think the standard OS3.1 datatype and preferences support scaling of the image, so having the exact resolution isn't that important - it will just tile or centre the image for you. Also, I don't think the standard datatype does dithering, so this would probably be best done with Photoshop or whatever beforehand...
Engineers do it with precision
--
http://www.robthenerd.com