Well, lets see, those two systems run Amiga OS 4.1 which was developed from Amiga OS 3.1.
so what? why is this being hammered on every time? morphos and aros are implementing the same api, the same features and extend on that, thats exactly the same what happens on os4 one way or another. os4 may or may not be based on the genuine sources (we dont know for fact) but crucial elements as exec are foreign (as its been claimed). does that matter? does windows8 have to contain windows 3.1 code to be called windows?
They have the legal right to call them AmigaOne computers.
exactly. as in, i dont call aros "amiga" when i run it on my amigas, its still aros. and im fine with it to be amiga compatible.
You maybe hung up on legacy hardware, but my main use for my A2000 these days is to hold ISA breadboard cards as a convenient source of power and a useful backplane.
thats fine, to each his own. still, what you consider source of power, is actually called amiga. and then you use morphos, which is fine too, so why dont you claim it to be "amiga" i wonder..