68k emulation benchmarks

[wawrzon]

this is 68k compatibility test, how about include original systems, and 68k emu on on other systems like winuae/sys_spec. bernd (i didnt know you trust him suddenly) has provided enough comparisons. otherwise it really starts to look like sole os4/mos contest..,

[wawrzon]

unreadable graph? i dont know. all that has been proven by these graphs is that x1k performs about like an g4mac. this will likely remain readable. instead it would be put into wider perscepctive even if th real hardware would prove damn slow and uae damn fast, we would know where x1k and a mac stand in this comparison.

[wawrzon]

Yep. I mean say 68020 at 14MHz would result in a huge bar shrinking the others so that it would be impossible to tell differences between them. Even 060@50 is slow enough to result is quite unreadable graph:

68060 faster than emulation on sam440 on integer? and only three times slower than x1k??? if thats is truth then the graphs are actually telling something very unexpected??!"!

edit, and on float sam is only 5-6 times faster than my 060? as far as ive checked the 604/150 was already nearly three times as fast running 68k code.

[wawrzon]

right. i dont remember any optimization options in amiblitz either.