dnetc benchmarks

[wawrzon]

no, i cant fault him either. but as long as logic behind that is only within his head, none is going to drag me behind such a project. anyway, daddy, i dont think you will be ever able to afford this piece, as you always are complaining about your bad finances, then all your argument must be taken with a benefit of doubt, im afraid.

[wawrzon]

@jorkany

>>Looks like things ARE starting to come out. This is the eventuality. Expect more as time goes on.

I love conspiracy theories

erm, still what about your x500 case proptotype which you have announced as almost ready, just need to wait another week, wait, it was.. last spring?? once you are taking yourself seriously, no wonder you take other announcements of coresponding value seriously as well.

[wawrzon]

x1k is for sure not a mind blowing succes as os4 hardcore fans try suggest. on the other hand lets look at that in comparison. this machine has a apparently good results on bernd rosch 68k benchmark, so from 68k perspective where we will likely never see a 1.8 ghz singlecore 68k compatible cpu in operation a ppc which such specs is already not a bad choice. imagine what would happen if natami team delivered it with even only 1ghz softcore instead of 100mhz one? wouldnt it be a achievement to be considered legendary? of course modern amithlon or aros with os4/mos likewise 68k compatibility would even be better, heck, probably even macmini with mos, especially considering more advanced system, and the x1k price is doubtless a nail to its coffin, but lets give it credit it deserves.