Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: AMIGA Graphics card question:  (Read 5607 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wawrzon

Re: AMIGA Graphics card question:
« on: June 07, 2009, 01:33:07 PM »
Quote from: rkauer;509702
And soon another Radeon card will follow...

http://hdrlab.org.nz/radeonhd-driver/


only for os4 as far as i get it.
 

Offline wawrzon

Re: AMIGA Graphics card question:
« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2009, 11:55:05 AM »
wouldnt it be possible to compile your drivers for 68k for use with mediator under 3.x? well, i suppose not. or if yes it would be probably too much work. afaik there is primarly already an electrical problem to this solution and also closed source elbox driver solution for the bridge. but just wanted to ask.
probably even 4.0 drivers wouldnt work even if one could fit such a card into mediator.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2009, 12:02:21 PM by wawrzon »
 

Offline wawrzon

Re: AMIGA Graphics card question:
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2009, 12:34:12 PM »
@zipper:
lol, yeah, nearly, by obvious stupidity of my question, but i couldnt resist.
 

Offline wawrzon

Re: AMIGA Graphics card question:
« Reply #3 on: June 09, 2009, 04:04:55 AM »
Quote from: Hans_;510054
If you're talking about the RadeonHD driver then no, it can't be recompiled for 68k. It uses Amiga OS 4.x's PCI interfacing API, not OpenPCI, and OS 4.x's library interfaces. I don't have classic PowerPC hardware, and didn't see much point in supporting the classic anyway, TBH. Classic Amigas don't have the speed required to get much out of these cards. Heck, a few people even think that it's pointless supporting this card on next-gen Amigas because the CPU is too slow, and so is PCI.

I have no idea whether these cards will work with a Mediator board under OS4.

Hans


fine. thats what i thought anyway. im not even sure if mediator works with open pci. but then i only would think it might be worth considering if the effort was not much beyond stright recompilation. keep up. thanks for the answer.