Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: A2000 which is better  (Read 3550 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Markus_Bieler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 369
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.traumstation.ch
Re: A2000 which is better
« on: June 02, 2012, 02:48:14 PM »
Quote from: Dimitrios;694790
So should I get the 6.2 ?


Go for the 6.2. The only advantage of the A2000 4.0 Braunschweig, you can jumper that one with the help of the ramcard in the CPU-socket and the A1000 bootroms the way that it acts like a real A1000.

The A2000 6.2 on the otherhand could easely upgraded to 1mb or 2mb Chipmem.

And remind both are stoneage in the spirit of computertechnology

Markus
 

Offline Markus_Bieler

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2002
  • Posts: 369
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.traumstation.ch
Re: A2000 which is better
« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2012, 02:56:27 PM »
Quote from: _ThEcRoW;694997
That pentium 4 card is strange. I never heard of a p4 class expansion for amigas. In the case the card is real(probably, as socs like that exists in embedded market), i doubt you could use it in your amiga.


You can pop in every CPU card that fits. The only different between a "Bridgeboard" and a stanbdard industry CPU-card is the "bridge" between Amiga and Intel. The industry card just gives you a second independent Computer in the A2000 and you need keyboard mouse gfx etc. twice.

(sorry for offtopic)

Markus