Still, as neither of you provided the information to back up your accusations
I think you are stretching credibility here.
I wrote a short summary for an answer because there isn't a need for a long winding response in every instance. In this case, it has already been established that the OS was transferred to ITEC 11 months ago...whether it was sold or transfered isn't important at all. The point was, whether they sold it, or gave it away, they were answering questions about a product they did not have plans to continue supporting.
It is so one sided and obvious....anyway, its clear you don't see it.
Btw, you did bring up the word 'pegasos' as if its somehow related. I do not own a pegasos, and I am hardly a fan of genesi. (no more, no less, than of kmos really).
as for slander...I am aware people toss out legal terms when trying to shut down conversation, but I don't think it is really useful in this conversation. It is not slander to notice that in the Q&A a lot of answer were given, answers that will not be realized.
in that respect, going back to the original topic, how could the q&a be characterized as news? At best it was speculation, and if you want to believe honest speculation, ok, but its still not news....that is where I came into this conversation, wondering how anyone could still claim the q&a was news.
