Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: First (?) call for Micro$oft to abandon Vista.  (Read 18773 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline stefcep2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1467
    • Show all replies
Re: First (?) call for Micro$oft to abandon Vista.
« on: November 10, 2007, 05:37:08 AM »
Reactivating vista 5 times.. are you saying you have a single-user license? if so, yeah you can't keep re-installing it on every machine you buy unless you wipe the old hard drives-otherwise its called piracy.  You are not supposed to do it with AmigaOS3.9 either..

x86 Linux and Windows and Macs (whichever version you are talking about) are inefficient bloated resource hogs: GB of superfast memory, CPU''s running in the 1000's of MHZ,Terrabyte hard drives. WTF!!!! The OS is supposed to control the way the user interacts with the PC ie icons, menus, windows , dialogs, mouse pointer movement.  Why in the hell do we need such advanced hardware to do such simple things?  GEOS on a 6502 could do this.  Why isn't the computer ready to go when I power it up, why don't we have zero boot times, why don't programs start instantaneously when I double click on their icon, why do menus stall before opening, why does everything go slower when i read a cd/dvd/hard drive.  WHY ??Because the hardware architecture that any new computer you can now buy is based on the Windows-design:  its windows that dictates hardware design. Even if Linux or MacOS runs on it, the underlying architecture is windows-compliant.  Software ie other OS's can try to minimize the hardware constraints it can't remove them.  At bootup, mouse drivers, keyboard drivers, video, USB drivers, cpu drivers, PCI drivers blah,blah all have to be loaded.  Why can't this  built into the hardware ie in the peripherals themselves so the OS immediately knows all about the hardware when its powered-up?  The Amiga didn't have to load up aga drivers, floppy drivers, mouse drivers..
 

Offline stefcep2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1467
    • Show all replies
Re: First (?) call for Micro$oft to abandon Vista.
« Reply #1 on: November 14, 2007, 08:45:28 AM »
[

Quote

Why isn't the computer ready to go when I power it up, why don't we have zero boot times, why don't programs start instantaneously when I double click on their icon

On my laptop (ASUS G1S) laptop, wordpad.exe starts instantaneously when I double click on it's icon.


it damn well ought to its a crappy little text editor that if there were an equivalent on C64 would also start instantaneously


WHY ??Because the hardware architecture that any new computer you can now buy is based on the Windows-design[/quote]
This statement is false.

ACPI (Advanced Configuration and Power Interface) architecture was developed by HP, Intel, Microsoft, Phoenix and Toshiba. Note Microsoft and Toshiba in HD-DVD(another topic)...

Look in "Device Manager" -> Computer -> "ACPI x86 based PC" (HAL.dll, HALACPI, HALMACPI.dll). HAL = hardware abstraction layer.

Anyway, Intel and Phoenix are developing embedded style lite OS(extensions for firmware) for the X64 PCs i.e. Hyperspace.


Yep,  and only ONE of these companies makes an OS: guess who?


[
 

Offline stefcep2

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2007
  • Posts: 1467
    • Show all replies
Re: First (?) call for Micro$oft to abandon Vista.
« Reply #2 on: November 15, 2007, 01:35:00 AM »
Quote

coldfish wrote:
Quote
Why isn't the computer ready to go when I power it up, why don't we have zero boot times, why don't programs start instantaneously when I double click on their icon.


Welcome to the physical limitations of hard-disk technology.  


yep ok hard disks take time to spin up, but the data transfer rates and data densities are 100 times more than they were in the days when a 20 meg hd for an A500 was huge yet, booting up takes ten times as long.  why does 1000 times more data need to be loaded at boot to make a gui appear and get the mouse, and kb to work?