Would have to disagree, even Doom/quake runs a lot better with the Voodoo 5 card over my Voodoo 3. Plus workbench runs smoother and I can get 1920x1080 with high true colour (or whatever it is) so if one can get a really good deal (which come up quite often on Amibay) I'd get the Voodoo 5.
The VSA-100/Napalm is more powerful but it only shows with deep screens at high resolutions which I have observed also. I have a fast 68060 and it can't push anything over 800x600 in 3D so it's useless for 3D. There is enough CPU power for higher resolutions and depth in 2D but then the Voodoo 3 is only a hair behind here also. With my Voodoo 3 3000 with SGRAM, I get faster I/O bus throughput and gfx memory speeds than my Voodoo 4. This mainly helps with lower depths and CPU dependent gfx operations.
The display also looks sharper, doesn't compare to the ATI card for 2D though.
I agree and this was a well known fact back in the day. The Voodoo 4-5 has a sharper display than the Voodoo 3. I consider this a minor advantage though.
I can also over clock the Voodoo 5 higher than I could with the Voodoo 3 and the gains can be seen in frame rate. The latest drivers work fine for me. As for it needing additional power it's no different than plugging in a HDD so not really a good reason to not get a Voodoo 5 if you can.
That's interesting because my Voodoo 3 was way more overclockable than my Voodoo 4 which I am not overclocking at all now (it had pixel problems with minor overclocking and the VSA-100 supposedly burns out easy with overclocking). My Voodoo 3 3000 would overclock by 20% easy and all day with no extra heat sinks or cooling. I never found the limit of overclocking but I stopped because the gains were minor and I don't like aggressive overclocking. Maybe the VSA-100s in your Voodoo 5 received a die shrink which would help with overclocking and power consumption.