Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Licensing vs certification (part deux)  (Read 6159 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Wilse

Re: Licensing vs certification (part deux)
« on: October 14, 2003, 04:00:52 PM »
So.................has anyone actually applied to Amiga Inc. for a license?

If so, what was the outcome?

Because, until someone does and then publicly explains what stopped them from getting it, the whole argument is moot.

I bought a Pegasos and an AmigaOne. I'd like to see OS4 on the pegasos *and* MOS on the AmigaOne.

Now why is noone bleeting about MOS not having been ported to the A1 yet?
Personally, I'd love that - then I'd be able to use the thing at least.  :-P

These arguments are amusing but futile methinks...

Offline Wilse

Re: Licensing vs certification (part deux)
« Reply #1 on: October 14, 2003, 05:00:57 PM »
So the guy never heard from them again - proves nothing.

Offline Wilse

Re: Licensing vs certification (part deux)
« Reply #2 on: October 14, 2003, 05:07:00 PM »
Quote
Even if someone got a license to sell Pegasos+AmigaOS bundles, you wouldn't be allowed to buy AmigaOS for your Pegasos. It's not AmigaOS licensed/bundled/dongled, and it's not bought from an artificially created "Amiga" market.


This is not certain. If stand alone versions can be released for Blizzard, theoretically this could also happen for Peg.

Quote
Is my point clear yet? :)


Not really, no.
And even if there was no license, that doesn't mean it would automatically be ported.
Otherwise, why ain't MOS ported to the A1 yet?