Wolfeman wrote:
man, there are a lot of opinionated mo-fos in this thread [on this forum?]
Aye, opinions are like erseholes, eh? Everybody's got one.
:roll:
@wilse
Mac USB is slower, you can google various benchmark tests, that's just a fact. argue it all you want.
You are arguing with yourself, I'm afraid.
At no point did I state USB wasn't slower.
You told the original poster to "stay away" from any audio or HD USB peripherals.
What I said was there is no need to avoid USB *if* you are on a budget.
I stand by this and, for my purposes, the differences between it and firewire are negligible.
You have then decided to turn this into a completely irrelevant argument about which is faster in a benchmark test.
To this I say again,
horsefeathers! ;-)
I'm extremely happy for you if it doesn't haunt you or bother you, seriously, but PLEASE spare me the down-the-nose "addytude" regarding your belief of the phenomenon.
What on earth are you talking about?
It is *You* who is trying to tell *me* that I should only use FW because it is "faster".
My experience says I can happily get by with USB yet *you* persist. (Despite admitting to using USB yourself.)
If anyone has a "down-the-nose addytude," it is you, sir.
if you run a 24+ track system like I do where I am recording entire bands live and 16+ tracks recording in at once is the norm.
As I already explained, most of my projects are between 10-20 tracks and I rarely record more than two at a time. FW may indeed be the *only* way to go for you but that does not neccessarily apply to the rest of us.
To recap:
I had an exclusively FW audio/MIDI/HD set up on my Macbook.
It started freaking out and I had to use USB for some of it.
The USB works fine for my purposes.
It *may or may not* also work fine for the original poster.
If money is a consideration, the above may be helpful to him.
Whether it is slower on benchmark tests is irrelevant in this context.
Labouring the point in spite of this gives an impression of snobbiness.
case closed
If you say so, m'lud!
:pint: