Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Buffered interface- faster than vanilla 1200 IDE?  (Read 2868 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline golemTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 432
    • Show all replies
Buffered interface- faster than vanilla 1200 IDE?
« on: August 29, 2008, 06:36:41 PM »
Thats the question guys. I have an elbox 4xEIDE buffered interface with nothing on it but my main boot drive (which is compact flash). Is there any benefit in having the interface between the drive and the mobo?
                                                             
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1260, OS3.9BB2, Indivision Mk II, SCSI Jaz, Ethernet
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1230, OS3.1, Ethernet
A500, OS1.3
 

Offline golemTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 432
    • Show all replies
Re: Buffered interface- faster than vanilla 1200 IDE?
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2008, 06:53:25 PM »
Anyone want to buy one for their A1200? :-D
                                                             
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1260, OS3.9BB2, Indivision Mk II, SCSI Jaz, Ethernet
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1230, OS3.1, Ethernet
A500, OS1.3
 

Offline golemTopic starter

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 432
    • Show all replies
Re: Buffered interface- faster than vanilla 1200 IDE?
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2008, 08:47:25 PM »
To you £20. Anyone else £15. Only joking. £15 and its yours. I have two of these things and I only ever use one.
                                                             
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1260, OS3.9BB2, Indivision Mk II, SCSI Jaz, Ethernet
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1230, OS3.1, Ethernet
A500, OS1.3