Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: CF versus SCSI disk  (Read 2790 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 432
    • Show all replies
Re: CF versus SCSI disk
« on: August 24, 2007, 10:53:28 PM »
Darrin
You like a the Kates bush eh?

She's up there with the best of them.
                                                             
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1260, OS3.9BB2, Indivision Mk II, SCSI Jaz, Ethernet
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1230, OS3.1, Ethernet
A500, OS1.3
 

Offline golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 432
    • Show all replies
Re: CF versus SCSI disk
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2007, 11:29:42 PM »
Her first album I never got to know but Wuthering Heights is brilliant and I'm not a homosexual. I think her following albums up until The Red Shoes were all outstanding for their time. She will always be uber-hot I agree.
Back to topic..how comparable is the IDE interface on an A1200 to a Buddha through Zorro2 on a 2000?
                                                             
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1260, OS3.9BB2, Indivision Mk II, SCSI Jaz, Ethernet
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1230, OS3.1, Ethernet
A500, OS1.3
 

Offline golem

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 432
    • Show all replies
Re: CF versus SCSI disk
« Reply #2 on: August 25, 2007, 02:03:05 PM »
Quote

Darrin wrote:
Quote

golem wrote:
Her first album I never got to know but Wuthering Heights is brilliant and I'm not a homosexual.


Neither am I - what are you insinuating?  

:lol:

Quote

Darrin wrote:
Good question.  To be honest, I've never really bothered measuring the speeds on my A1200s, A2000 or A3000.  My main A1200T has the Power Flyer Gold IDE device in it and that is "supposed" to be fast, however when booting off a hard drive on either a plain A1200, my A1200T  or SCSI/IDE drives on my A2000/A3000 then I really can't tell.  Let's face it, compared to the amount of data we load for Workbench compared to the never ending flood of data required for Windows, what's an extra second or two?  :-)

I hear what you're saying dude.  :-)
I don't really notice a speed difference between loading drawers on my SCSI device or on my IDE hard drive either (even with a CPU intensive task in the background)
                                                             
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1260, OS3.9BB2, Indivision Mk II, SCSI Jaz, Ethernet
A1200 desktop, Blizzard 1230, OS3.1, Ethernet
A500, OS1.3