Actually, my tests are pretty subjective--mostly impression and observation. Like there's a few seconds of delay loading TV Paint under Cybergrafix while it's almost instantaneous under Picasso 96--this is on my A2500 which is loaded with memory but has a slow 25mhz 030 processor. And while you can drag screens under Cybergrafix, this is not really that useful because the mouse pointer dissapears on any but the first screen so you can't really switch between applications with this feature. So subjective opinion is that while Cybergrafix is more feature packed and ambitious code wise, it has some buggy corners and Picasso 96 seems to be more lean and mean--more tightly coded, faster and no noticible bugs.
