> "Too Much Caffeine" is an appropriate label for you. I KNEW as soon
> as I hit submit, that in typical zealot fashion, one of the myriad
> here would instantly latch on to the words "15 megabytes". Nevermind
> the meaning of the message, let's get anal about the exact wording...
It's not really the exact wording I'm on about, that would make me
pretty stupid. I was just annoyed with you lashing out with a broad
generalization of your opponents, making "us" sound like a bunch of
zealots who, because we don't share your views, have no grip of
reality.
> Look through the history of these forums. All of "you" zealotous, "Amiga is the one true light" people have always condemned EVERYTHING that
> is not Amiga because it's "bloated".
Once again, an unfair generalization and complete misinterpretation of "our" opinions. I believe I once said that I was using the Amiga because
it was the "least painful" to use. And the people here seemed mostly to agree. Does that sound even remotely like "Amiga is the one true light" to
you? My problem isn't your exact wording, as you would have people think, but rather the complete misinterpretation and unfair cathegorization of
"us".
> Here's a game (looks to be a good port) that requires 128 Megabytes to play, and I just wondered how long it would be before one of "you" started
> bitching and whining (as is ultimately typical here) about the fact that it requires 128mb to play or that you couldn't run it on your antiquated 060 machines.
Well, that point is fair enough I suppose. Being the moronic zealot I am, I might have asked a question about the memory usage. Maybe I'd even hack
the person who ported it to pieces by asking if there was any chance of optimizing it. Good thing you pre-empted me there.
Kay
