Cammy brings up a very interesting point which I copied below. This concerns me since I don't have an RTG graphics for my A2000 and it will be awhile before I can buy one. Workbench 3.1 floppies I have seen online are almost the same price as OS 3.9 and I rathe have 3.9. Can anyone using 0S 3.9 on ECS machines only (no graphics cards) give me feed back on the performance and speed of Workbench?Thanks
"Unfortunately picture.datatype in OS3.9 is just much slower than the 3.1 version, no matter what bitdepth the images being used are. I have pre-remapped every image I use in all of my programs to a special, locked 16 colour palette. In a program like YAM, which needs to load many of these images on startup, the difference in load times between 3.1 and 3.9 is very noticable. It takes less than a minute to load in 3.1, but over a minute to load in 3.9, and all the images it's loading are 4bit 16 colour iffs."