That's the problem. *You* probably know that, and you probably know the limitations. But you cannot assume that the average user does.
Anyone that has been in the Amiga scene for little more than a while knows there are differences between the 040 and the 060 design.
Well aware of the differences i cant see your point. I cant see why you insist on flaming Cosmos. What has he done you wrong.
There are some more hobbyists in the general computer scenes that builds adapters based on some others design end sell it. Someone even with a profit.
Because here a product is sold, with certain drawbacks that are not clearly announced to the average user. This is not your "make your 040 board a 060 board adapter", as claimed. If I would just buy this product, and install it as advertized, I would get just a crash. Plus, even when installed with a proper processor (i.e. without an FPU), it will not perform as good as a native 68060/50Mhz design. Instead, its creator tries to cheat away with some "chip ram bandwidth" numbers that are complete bogus for the purpose of the evaluation of the board.
Do you call that "good business practise"?
If you sell a product, you'd better call your customers what it does and what it does not.
If you don't understand how or what the "device" is about, you can always ask questions about it.
And in the case you complain about memory drawbacks... Hello.... The board you are attaching a 060 onto was not made for the darn 060.
You hack it onto another design. of course there will be drawbacks.
But i can live with those drawbacks if the hack gains performance...
That is what the whole adapter is all about, if I'm not mistaken.....
Business practice, what is your point. as i see it, cosmos has made no attempt of hiding any information... You came in flaming him long before i even got to ask any followup questions...
I do not care about my 68060.library here, really. That's provided under the license terms it came with, free of charge, for everyone. Download it from Aminet, be happy. That's all use within the license, so that'll be fine. *That* is not my problem.
Then why is there such a problem with the exec.library?
Cosmos ain't the only one making patches for it. AFAIK...
Regardless of content, a search on aminet posts no less than 6 exec.library patches....
If someone took his time to apply all the patches to the lib and put the patched binary back on aminet. would that be a violation?
What are your complains about, for real....?
@Thomas
Geez man, give it a rest.
Every bit of information of the 040/060 adapter is out in the open, and i dont agree with your claim that Cosmos is hiding information to his buyers. Go attac IComp regarding hiding information instead if this is your life mission.
About Cosmos making a profit of others work. I really dont see this argument either. The 040/060 adapter is opensource and everybody is free to make one. If i want to pay a friend for making it for me i really dont see the fuzz. I paid a dude money for making an IDE cable for me once. Is he stealing/profiting of the original IDE cable designers also? 50 EUR for his adapter is a very reasonable price thinking about the time i would spend making it myself. You would probably disagree, but if the adapter dont work, i would think Cosmos would provide good support, and if it is a fault in the build i think he would fix it without hesitation. So basicly this adapter comes with a guarantee.
Regarding the exec.lib patch. Here i can see your point, but who in their right mind cares? As Pyrre said, i really dont see the differece between a patch file, or a patched binary of the exec either.
And last. Cosmos.. Illuminati? Really? 
Cheers! 
yea i agree....
I have no doubts about Cosmos service, at all...
but, can we please get back on topic...?
just, please...