Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Possibly dumb question. 030 vs 040  (Read 8497 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pyrre

Re: Dumb question. 030 vs 040?
« on: May 27, 2010, 11:24:52 AM »
Quote from: runequester;561246
Looking at the mess of various accelerator cards that were made for amigas. I see some 040's clocked at lower speeds than some 030 cards. Would there be any gain to an 040 in that case, or is it better to just go for the higher mhz ?

I will try to answer as best as i can.
However, i would like to know what you are going to use the computer for...

I have a blizz 040 and a close friend of mine has a blizz 030.
(we have same amount of fastram)
In pure figures the 030 gives close to 7 or 8000 points in sysinfo.
while the 040 gives just over 14000 points.
(if i remember correctly. it has been a while since last time i powered up my A1200)

The 040 is faster, and generally the experience feels a lot crispier.
But like stated of others, the 040 gets HOT...

If speed is what you need. go for a 060. give a damn about 040.
In most cases a 030 (@50) will suit most applications.
And a 030 will almost always be cheaper.
I have a 030 50 in my a 500. and it is a blast to play around with.

Just make sure you get as much fastram as possible...
Amiga 1200 Tower Os 3.9
BPPC 603e+ 040-25/200, 256MBram, BVIsionPPC, Indivision AGA MK2.
Amiga 2000 (rev 4.0) Os 1.2/1.3
2088 bridgeboard, 2MB ram card, 2091 SCSI.
Amiga 500+ Os 2.1
Derringer 030, 32MBram, Buddha in sidecar, Indivision ECS.
Amiga CD32
Video decoder