uncharted wrote:
Darrin, I don't understand. There is this "obvious solution" you mention in your first post. You won't state what it is. People have come to the obvious conclusion that the "obvious solution" is piracy, but that is somehow insulting and slanderous to you.
So if this proposed "solution" is not piracy, then what is it and what possible reason would you have for not stating it?
If the "solution" is in fact piracy then why are you so insulted by a statement of fact?
I can't see your logic.
My solution is to obtain an unlocked version by whatever means necessary if CH refuses to register and unlock your copy on the grounds that you own an Elbox product.
I've already asked if "telling a fig" on the registration page will allow the stack to be used with the Mediator and nobody has answered yet. If the only solution is obtaining a key from another source then so be it. If person who does this doesn't want to be a "pirate" then they can do what I suggested and mail CH some cash in an unmarked envelope.
CH has engineered this problem himself. I'm just suggesting solutions. Personally, it doesn't affect me as I don't own anything that requires CH's stack to run. I'm just pissed off with the whole Amiga community attitude that allows instances like this to go unchallenged.
If CH has a problem with Elbox then he can put a "ELBOX SUCKS" banner at the top of his registration page along with an explaination of why he thinks they suck. Discriminating against certain Amiga users is not what I expect from a mature adult trying to run a business.
Let me just say a big "THANK YOU" for questioning my stance in a polite and civil manner. There are people on this thread that could learn a lot about debating by reading your posts.