Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Which OS are the worst and the best?  (Read 11569 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Insanity

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 66
    • Show all replies
Re: Which OS are the worst and the best?
« on: July 14, 2003, 03:10:17 PM »
Best OS:
1: Windows 2000.
2: don't use other systems that much, so I really don't need any other OS.


Worst:
1: NT 4.0 (by far)
talk about crappy OS. Have anyone of you ACTUALLY tried to do anything with it(anything at all...)?

2: Windows 95, (lacking most drivers and stuff)
3: Windows XP, (just irritatingly difficult to alter things in)
4: Mac OS.
/Insanity[RoX]
 

Offline Insanity

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2002
  • Posts: 66
    • Show all replies
Re: Which OS are the worst and the best?
« Reply #1 on: July 15, 2003, 07:51:19 AM »
Finally someone starts trashing NT4, because it really deserves it.

If you Internet explorer, notepad and word, then you can use almost any os (except windows 1.0, etc).

The saddest thing about IRIX and Solaris, is that the hardware required to run it cost $$$£££€€€.

But then again, sun makes laptops, ranging from 120000 SEK ( 8.1 SEK = 1 $ ) and up.

And we're talking SCSI and no crap here.

Wonder if it even has the option of running on battery. :)
/Insanity[RoX]