You're welcome to that opinion, but I've expressly stated mine. One of the posting guideline rules has to do with not slandering or libeling anyone. It's my opinion that it was broken.
The difference is, rather than immediately deleting or editing it, I wanted to use it as an example of wrongdoing. If I, or a moderator, had simply deleted the post as we did in the past, you guys would have gone apeshit, driving the rhetoric even higher.
All I'm asking is that you consider the WELL POSTED rules, then think before speaking on these forums.
Thanks Wayne. Just to be clear, I'm not questioning what you view as slander or libel. Or what you choose to moderate, or make an example of, at all.
What I am simply expressing is that Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have been subjected to way worse and a much larger quantity of ridicule on the internet. And you don't see them threatening to sue private sector folks over that. Thats because when you are a public figure you are by definition more open to public criticism and because suing private individuals with no financial stake in if you live or die as a company is just bad business. Because once you sue folks that say they don't like what you are doing, who would want to be a customer of a firm like that? What would be next, suing me if I was on with your tech support because I was an upset customer with a tech issue?
So of course do anything and everything you think is right in general and needed for practicality to protect the site. My point is not in regard to that at all. My point is that if they went after that person, why would I, a seperate private individual want to go anywhere near them, ever, for anything?