Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: More Amiga Inc BS  (Read 4554 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ffastback

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 300
    • Show all replies
Re: More Amiga Inc BS
« on: June 06, 2007, 07:26:16 PM »
Quote

weirdami wrote:
Too bad that would mean no minor league jockey in Kent, though. The people of Kent sure picked some winners to put on the city council.


Not so.  The corporate sponsorship helped push through the state funding according to one article.  With that secured they don't need the corporate sponsorship to proceed, it was extra revenue for it.  The corporate naming deal sponsorship was a means to an end at one time and after achieveing state funding is merely the cherry on top.  And Kent has pointed out they feel they will have no issues finding another sponsor (at least not at this point now).

Quote

I would think, though, that Amiga could refuse the early payment and just procede as originally agreed.


That might be a good play for them at this point if they never intended to pay.  In that scenario they could claim they would pay at the originally agreed to time only, saying the Amiga board did not appreciate being strong-armed.  

What I find most amusing from all this that Kent officials claim they knew of the issues ahead of time, yet they now want early payment because the issues came to light more recently?  I suppose they may say it had to do with the degree to which things came to light, but it still seems fishy all around.
 

Offline ffastback

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2007
  • Posts: 300
    • Show all replies
Re: More Amiga Inc BS
« Reply #1 on: June 07, 2007, 07:48:02 PM »
Quote

amigadave wrote:
Bottom line is that the City of Kent has entered into an agreement with Amiga Inc. and now wants to change it, but must get Bill and Co. to agree to the changes.  As a former City employee, I can tell you from personal experience that City Council Persons are not always the sharpest tool in the shed!  :lol:


Remember though that Amiga feed the city supposedly the following snippets about the company to get into the agreement:

Amiga is the "third most-recognized brand in Europe".  When the Seattle Times asked for a reference on this Bill could not provide one, claiming he read it in some European magazine or something like that sometime back.

Amiga is "the world’s premier provider of multi-media enabling technologies".  I personally think to call this a stretch is being extremely extremely nice.

So, is this a fair representation to make in order to make this agreement happen?

I think Kent has a decent amount of leverage here.