Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?  (Read 13146 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nDude

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 18
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« on: September 16, 2003, 11:16:03 AM »
Imo the A1200 was the biggest disappointment.
It was severely under powered for a new generation Amiga at the time.
Things it did lack was:
- a New blitter (It was still the same slow 16 bit thing !!!)
- new sound chips (same old 2x2 channel 8 bit stuff)
- 24 bit color mode instead of extending ham would have been nice
- 8 bit byte-per-pixel mode or even the converter chip from the CD32
- full vga compatibility or at least such a mode
- HD floppy controller
- buffered serial port
- space for a 3.5" IDE HD would have been a lot more appropriate
- 512 kb of fast ram/faster chip ram would have helped it tremendously
  since chip ram didn't have enough bandwidth.
- 030/25 or whatever they put in the atari falcon.

After considering the extra cost for a 2.5" inch hard drive a new serial
card and a special Amiga capable monitor they could have charged more
and it still would have been cheaper.
 

Offline nDude

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 18
    • Show all replies
Re: What was the Best and "not so good" Amiga Models?
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2003, 12:59:12 PM »
Quote
The best was the 1000. It appears the "first" of something good is usually the best... (for a while at least... at least until the Amigaone with OS 4 comes out....)


While the A1000 was way ahead of any other home computer or PC at the time , both the hardware and OS.
The A1 is just an obsolete, non inventive, hardware with an OS that tries to catch up to modern standards.