After my little outburst last week about A.org I have calmed down

The article above is on the whole fair, although ther are two points that I feel require a little mention:
1) It doesn't mention that Genesi went after the Amiga trademark to cause Amiga problems.
2) The mention of Amiga's countersuit is valid, but the comments and quotes shown afterwoods are only there to agrevate, and add little if any to the topic.
3) According to the articles breakdown of the original Amiga/Genesi contract (and I am only going on the words here as I have not seeen the original) it says that:
The contract states that future Thendic devices may be added to this list, but those devices would require the approval of Amiga Inc. to be so added.
Surely thats means that if Amiga do not wish to approve a device to add to the list they do not have to, thus rendering Genesi's case irrelevent?
Rassilon