Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Interview with Trevor Dickinson  (Read 20552 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Amiga_Nut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 926
    • Show all replies
Re: Interview with Trevor Dickinson
« on: May 13, 2010, 01:15:16 AM »
Quote from: ddniUK;557305
Ok since we are talking comparative value then we should use the average UK house price as a base.

Our constant is £1500 - Launch price in UK of A1000 and suggested launch price of X1000

Average UK house price in 1985 £31000
Average UK house price in 2010 £223000

Therefore an A1000 (£1500) was 4.8% of the average house value in 1985
Whereas an X1000 (£1500) will be 0.67% of the average house value in 2010

So an X1000 today is about 7.2x less expensive than an A1000 in 1985.


Clearly ignoring the technological gulf that the A1000 represented in 1985 ;)


1. Average price where? In the scottish highlands? Mode or median house price is much more useful than the mean average anyway.
2. Doubt it, at $1300 I don't remember the UK price being anything like £1500

Also you can't compare it like that, the A1000 cost 1/3 price of a top spec 512k Mac, and a lot less than an AT IBM PC with similar spec, hell a PC was easily the same OTT price as that Macintosh. The A1000 was better AND cheaper than either of those two anyway and that's the point, and just 18 months later you could get an A500 for half the price too.  

So in context...what would you get for £1500 in PC hardware today on a like for like basis, a lot is the answer, certainly an i7 of the highest order with the best Nvidia mobo and the best graphics card and ludicrous amounts of memory.  Do Apple even sell normal tower computers still or just that iMac?
 

Offline Amiga_Nut

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 926
    • Show all replies
Re: Interview with Trevor Dickinson
« Reply #1 on: May 15, 2010, 03:54:11 AM »
Umm well for the internet generation, one thing you can do on OS4 is make sure when you reboot your machine is cleared of any crap malware/spyware/virus that may have got through. Compare this to Windows PCs where every second you are on the internet your OS is slowly killed at the mere whiff of a TCP/IP connection. Win7 is so broken (as in still hasn't fixed basic issues since XP) regarding this that I laugh my head off at so called experts who endorse Win7.

Going back to Wii + OS4...are you crazy? The Wii is a mildly breathed on Gamecube with some $150 rubbish woolly controllers and the CPU is pathetic, worse than SAM. It's a great time for non OS-specific fun technically with A/V codecs/Flash/Java. You don't need to actually own a Windows machine at all anymore, or blow your cash on those pathetic overpriced Apple jokes. If ever there was a time people wanted an alternative to Windows (and actually don't like Apple computers/OS) it is now. Rumours of IBM and OS/2 and Goolgle with their joke of an OS Chrome, which is a massive FAIL, show just how fractured the market will be. We need the equivalent of an high quality/equally price superior machine just like in the car world you don't need to have a Ford badge, you can spend the same cash and get a far superior car from Germany. Same with computers today. Nobody cares if there is a Microsoft logo on boot up, never have never will. They have it as they are trying to fix the shortcomings of the previous release of Microshit on their machine or they have no choice. Note to Apple, add a bloody second mouse button too.

All those stupid idiots at Amiga Inc had to do was ring up Sony and negotiate getting OS4 onto the PS3. Yellow Dog Linux is utter crap. So Simple. A no brainer. And they might even be here today, but they are idiots and the opportunity was lost probably for the last time to get Amiga back as a mass market machine. Hell they could have done a special white version of the PS3 with an Amiga logo for not much money at all later on...with a branded keyboard and mouse.

$300/400 for a massively powerful CPU/GPU with some exotic Blu-Ray decoding...could you really have asked for a better basis for a new Amiga in 2007? No you couldn't!

And CELL port of OS4 would be a lot quicker than x86 or x86-64bit.

Having said that X-1000 is not a mass market machine and therefore it will never be 'value for money' you have to accept that. Had AmigaONE been around in slightly bigger numbers I would have bought one of those at the start just to run OS4. It all went pear shaped when there was an OS completed but no hardware to run it on! Only the Amiga IP owners make that possible to paraphrase an old saying ;)