You mean what the Amiga needs is just a little bit more blind belief and fanatism so we can get feeded with more BS spoon by spoon ?
No.
Blind belief and fanatism doesn't make things better.
There is nothing wrong with being sceptical. And there is nothing wrong with pointing out ones scepticism. But there is a big difference between doing it in a constructive way or in a 'trollish' way.
I made a choice to answer your post this way; further describing my point of view. I could, however, have looked upon your post as a bait for me to react to and thus have answered something like "Are you an idiot? That is not what I wrote! If you feel like reading things into my posts, things that actually isn't there to be found, then you can shut the {bleep} up!", or something the like, but that would have been a 'trollish' attitude, non-constructive, and nothing good would have come out of it. I just don't see the point in using that kind of attitude.
I don't know your point of view. But, when reading your reaction to my post, I have to ask: do you think it is okay (or a good thing) to react in the same way as Glittering did (calling the hospitalization of Adams father a hoax, without even having certified what is true or not)?
