Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: SFS or PFS ?  (Read 2757 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline wurzel

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Jan 2007
  • Posts: 273
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.wurzel.co.uk
Re: SFS or PFS ?
« on: February 15, 2007, 12:04:28 AM »
IMHexperience ...

I've had 2 A1200's, a desktop which lasted around
10 years and which I recently transferred to a Tower.

I've had FFS on my boot disk & PFS on all other disks/partitions.

I've never had an FFS go bad on me (touch wood!) but I have had a problem with PFS. However, in all cases, PFS Doctor recovered the drive & I never lost any data.

Also, PFS drives are much faster but the best feature is the recover deleted files. You can actually recover files that you deleted, up to the 990th one. Works just like another directory.

I have never tried sfs but can wholeheartedly recommend PFS.

IMHO

--
A1200 Power Tower, Blizzard 060 with SCSI, 196mb Ram, Mediator, Voodoo 5500, Spider USB, Hauppage TV, Soundblaster & Fast Ethernet cards, 2gb boot/program drive, 40gb data drive, 40x12x48 CDRW