Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Which OS are the worst and the best?  (Read 11568 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nightcrawler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 170
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amerikanskbulldog.no
Re: Which OS are the worst and the best?
« on: July 14, 2003, 03:29:39 PM »
Ok... I still think WB3.0 is the best OS I've ever used. I guess I have a fetish of some sort  :-D

Next best: FreeBSD. It was pretty hard to understand at first, but now I really like it. Logical and functional. I don't like the gui's that are available for it though. Or any *nix gui. They're probably very good, but any gui that isn't as comfortable as Workbench annoys me. I really hate clicking on things that don't respond immediately.

Worst by far: AROS.   This is of course just a shameless attempt to annoy developers enough to work faster on it... Please tell me if it works. Can I please have a complete x86 native version now? I have a mini-itx system that's gagging for it :-D

Worst: Windows ME. Has anyone been able to find an OS behind the bugs? It cost me quite a bit of money, as I found that hardware was quickly accelerated upon trying to use it. Accelerated as in across the room...

Next worst: Windows 98. I'm using it now. It annoys me greatly. I get jumpy if I haven't seen a BSOD in a couple of days.
\\"There are still places where people think that the function of the media is to provide information.\\"
 -- Don Rottenberg--