Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?  (Read 2711 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nostalgiac

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Join Date: Dec 2006
  • Posts: 408
    • Show all replies
Re: WB 3.x uglier than WB1.x?
« on: September 12, 2009, 08:17:06 PM »
Quote from: mikeymike;522812
I'm just wondering if I'm alone in thinking this, and perhaps it has to do with that I started on an A500 and a long time later got an A1200, but I think the default look for Workbench (say 1.2 or 1.3) looks better than WB 3.x.

For me it's the drab grey background and almost monochrome look to WB3.x by default, whereas the colour scheme picked for WB1.x looks quite cheerful.


weirdos have a right to life as well ;-)

Tom UK
2000/2060/128mb/2320/2gb/C64-3D/Hydra-Aminet on OS 3.9

c128/1541/1750/1351 with Dolphin Dos and eprom burner