I just can't quite imagine why Amiga Inc would put 35 chairs, computers and 17/21 inch monitors in a 15 (6-8 times 2 cubicles plus 3 offices) people environment. The FACT is that SOME items in the list are NOT from Amiga Inc's office, there's no conspiracy theory about it (other than that "oooh, they had SO much equipment? no wonder they didn't have money".)
You completely misread the quote from the auction site. The full quote is:
The following items were identified by Amiga employees as being vendor owned and wereonly used as "loaners". Some items on the main equipment list have been included in the sale from other parties.
So, the reason they clarify that these items are from 3rd parties is because they were loaned to Amiga, and had to be returned. The auction site says NOTHING about these items NOT being in Amiga's office. Please read the links before making up facts?
Good advice!!!I don't follow this stuff religiously, but I do recall that they used to be in bigger offices, and then moved into smaller offices later on (about the time their phone numbers were disconnected and all that). My guess is that they just had the stuff piled up in the corner. It's not like they had enough staff to use it all. :-)
The amount of furniture matches the amount of computers. That says a lot. There's 30-or-so comptuers up for auction, and some servers. Amiga claimed to have 30-or-so employees at one time. Big whoop.
The auction includes a refrigerator. Since when does a fridge become obsolete?
Seriously, I wouldn't bother to verify what's exactly part of the auction. This is already rediculous as it is. All I know is, there's an auction going on, it's happening because Amiga Inc. is in default of rent payment, and Amiga is trying to keep quiet about it. That tells me they are in deep doo-doo. Is this *really* worth debating?
Please, how about debating that lovely interview with Matt about GUI design? GUI's are my forte, and I'd like to talk about that some more. Let this topic die!