Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Opinions on the Buddha IDE controller?  (Read 4077 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trilobyte

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 210
    • Show all replies
    • http://aaack.org
Re: Opinions on the Buddha IDE controller?
« on: December 05, 2009, 01:01:19 AM »
I used a Buddha/Catweasel combo board in my A2000 for a while, with a 68060.  It was indeed fast, but something to remember is that IDE uses a lot more of your CPU time than SCSI, in general.  SCSI (when it's working right) uses the SCSI chip to do a lot of calculation, freeing up your processor for other tasks.  IDE usually is driven mainly by the CPU.  As you said, the Buddha will use PIO mode, which is processor-intensive, but is not necessarily "slow."  It's not like you can push *that* much over the ZorroII bus anyway.  If a GVP HC+8 can do a max of 3.4mb/sec and the Buddha gets 2.6mb/sec on a much cheaper drive, that's not so bad.  Plus, you can use cheap ATAPI CD-RW drives with the Buddha, with MakeCD and the included IDE-Fix.  With your '040, though, I wouldn't try to do lots of multitasking while burning a CD.  And you still might only be able to burn at 2X... what takes a lot of CPU time is making the "ISO" FS on the fly, so if you're also pushing the CPU to do non-DMA PIO data transfer, watch out...

The fastest, most reliable CD burning I've seen on the Amiga is using a decent ATAPI burner on A4000T's IDE bus with IDE-Fix, and pushing data to it from the A4000T's SCSI bus.  Not as reliable was my TekMagic '060 burning from SCSI drive to SCSI burner... it would only get 4x on a good day, despite the TekMagic's SCSI bus being so fast.

- t
Amiga user since \'96, when I could finally afford one
Commodore 8-bit since before I could tie my shoes