Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Which version of OSX to use?  (Read 7650 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trilobyte

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 210
    • Show all replies
    • http://aaack.org
Re: Which version of OSX to use?
« on: April 16, 2009, 09:01:28 PM »
Quote

lofstudio wrote:

Save2600-- have you tried SheepShaver for classic emulation?


Multiple times I have tried running SheepShaver on my Intel Mac at work.  It just crashes and crashes.  I have plenty of experience with ShapeShifter and Fusion on the Amiga, as well as with actual 68k and PPC Mac hardware, so I'm pretty sure the instability of these two apps is just the fault of the apps themselves.  One of them I got to "chime" but it would crash when I asked it to boot from CD.

There is very little reason to run SheepShaver or Basilisk II on a PowerPC Mac.  Just run 10.4 and use Classic mode.  If you need 10.5, partition your drive and have 10.5 on one partition and 10.4 on the other.  If you need to run Classic, be under 10.4.  If you have some piece of software which requires 10.5, boot into 10.5.  

My guess is you'll be running under 10.4 more often... 10.5 is still kind of buggy and does indeed "feel" a little pokier on PowerPC hardware...

The only reason you'd want to run the emulators is if you have some software which won't run in Classic because it is too old, like some software which has been broken since System 7 came out, or since the PowerPC transition.  If that is really a sticking point with you, eBay an SE/30 or something.

- t
Amiga user since \'96, when I could finally afford one
Commodore 8-bit since before I could tie my shoes
 

Offline trilobyte

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Join Date: Oct 2006
  • Posts: 210
    • Show all replies
    • http://aaack.org
Re: Which version of OSX to use?
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2009, 09:13:17 PM »
Quote

StormLord wrote:

all apple OSes from 10.0 till 10.4.11 were more faster and more responsive in every newer update, 10.4.11 is the fastest OSX that currently exists.
The introduction of 10.5 was the worst product apple ever brought to market, because of MANY bugs and it felt like an elephant rather than a leopard.


Agree 100%...

One small example:  on this 400 MHz Pismo, I thought 10.3.9 would be the fastest... since this Pismo has a slow G3, and old graphics... but actually 10.4.11 is faster!  I have since wiped 10.3.9 off the computer...

-t
Amiga user since \'96, when I could finally afford one
Commodore 8-bit since before I could tie my shoes