Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: OctaMed sound studio  (Read 29455 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hooligan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 515
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.mikseri.net/hooligan
Re: OctaMed sound studio
« on: February 28, 2011, 11:28:09 AM »
Quote from: magnetic;618385
xdelusion

Yes, it would make a nice plug in for Digibooster or something. Or even as a standalone app on next gen amiga type systems!

But what i'm realling wondering is which Octamed is best for my 030 1200? I want the built in synth and drums with sample ability, and hopefully external midi support. (e.g. controlling drum machines, keyboards, etc)


Many will no doubt be against, but I'd boldly and proudly say V4.

Just notice, there is a bug in OMED V4 when using MIDI-instruments and samples on the same track, you will hear a high pitch squeeking noice if you don't use note-off.
 

Offline hooligan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 515
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.mikseri.net/hooligan
Re: OctaMed sound studio
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2011, 10:17:37 PM »
Quote from: magnetic;618585
Hooligan

Why do you prefer octamed4? Which one has the built in synth and drum machines?


V4 was by far the best tool if you wanted to be productive. The user interface is easy to learn, its simple and quick. Even after years and a couple dozen finished songs on SoundStudio I still didn't feel at home with it. It certainly wasn't a bad tracker, quite the opposite.. but I (and I know many many others) preferred V4 over Soundstudio even if we missed important features.

V4 has Synthsounds, I very rarely used them but some lead and bass-instruments were pretty cool sounding.

I also want to add that I have used Med since V1 .. and ALL of the versions ever released... I have great respect for the program, I spit on Protracker ;)