Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Missing historical coverage for today in the news?  (Read 3370 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show all replies
Re: Missing historical coverage for today in the news?
« on: December 07, 2009, 05:42:19 PM »
Touchy, touchy.  I like Americans, but their government's foreign policy frankly stinks and hasn't changed much in several decades.  But really we've done some crappy things too, particularly to the native folk here.

Maybe that's the problem, governments are generally like farts, they all smell, Americans problem is they keep trying to insist that theirs doesn't smell...
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show all replies
Re: Missing historical coverage for today in the news?
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2009, 03:21:52 PM »
It was Lord Acton who explained why corruption-free and government are oxymorons.  

"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men."

Lord Acton, in a letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton, 1887

I think most people in most countries are willing to accept that, like our current government lead by Manchurian Candidate Rudd, with Climate Change denier Abbott sitting in the wings.  They're both serving somebody other than the public, but they always give us something right before the elections in the hopes it'll sway us in their favour.

In the end you pay your taxes and hope for the best.  But really anyone who *wants* to be Prime Minister, Chancellor, President, Supreme Leader, what ever, is likely to be corrupt, otherwise why would they want the job?
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.