Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Legal Status of Amiga Clones (past and present)  (Read 7330 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show all replies
Re: Legal Status of Amiga Clones (past and present)
« on: January 10, 2009, 12:38:40 AM »
We actually don't know what the agreement between Gateway and the original Amiga Inc (Amino).  There is some evidence that Gateway retain ownership of some or all of Amiga IP (worthless now, it's all over 17 years old), brand and patents and gave the original Amiga Inc exclusive use of these.   The Original Amiga Inc transfered this agreement to KMOS (the current Amiga Inc) to avoid creditors and unpaid employees.  Whether this was allowed in the agreement with Gateway is unknown.  And any action would need to be undertaken by Gateway's parent company Acer.  Suffice to say the brand name has been badly sullied by KMOS and is probably not worth fighting over.

As for Kickstart, one could argue that it's part of Amiga OS and that if you legally own a copy of Amiga OS you own the Kickstart that is associated with it.  This would be a tough fight in a court since they were separate products, but given that the whole ROM concept was abandoned last century it's hard to tell what a Judge/Jury might rule.

Add that to the fact that Hyperion has a claim to Amiga OS through their contract with the original Amiga Inc and it's subsequent insolvency.  The cut and bail to KMOS is a good argument that the original Amiga Inc was indeed insolvent, so it is possible and likely that Hyperion owns OS 4 and the right to use the AmigaOS name.

I think I have a headache....
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show all replies
Re: Legal Status of Amiga Clones (past and present)
« Reply #1 on: January 10, 2009, 04:24:17 AM »
@Haranguer

Depends which US definition of "insolvency" you mean.  Amiga Inc were not insolvent by the Bankruptcy Code but WERE INSOLVENT by the Uniform Commercial Code.  They were also insolvent in common everyday speech.  The contract doesn't specify BC or UCC.  US Law is quite different to the Common Law practised here or in the UK.  

The absolute joke is that AmigaDos will never generate enough money to pay even a reasonable percentage the lawyers' fees in this case...
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.
 

Offline persia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 3753
    • Show all replies
Re: Legal Status of Amiga Clones (past and present)
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2009, 12:35:21 PM »
One also has to realise the threat of a lawsuit is enough. The Amiga market is extremely tiny, a lawsuit could easily consume any profit a company could hope to make.  The possible penalty outweighs the possible reward...
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

What we\'re witnessing is the sad, lonely crowing of that last, doomed cock.