Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ADPro vs. ImageFX  (Read 15857 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline hardlink

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 586
    • Show all replies
Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« on: March 02, 2010, 03:58:20 PM »
Quote from: cecilia;545780
I worked with ADPro for a while - even used "Fred" which was a batch processor thingy for ADPRo. I'm not sure how many people really used that but I am One Of The Few.

Hi Few-

I didn't exactly use "Fred", more like I tried to use Fred, and my system went Dead -  I meditated with the Guru. Every time. Could have been some configuration qirk, but it was much easier to just run the mighty ImageFX. So that's my experience with  ADPro vs. ImageFX.

Edit: I't been a long time, I may be confusing "Fred" with "ProControl"; even so, IFX + Arexx is much more useful.

NotQuiteOnTopic: Does anyone else use ImageFX as a verb? When anyone talks about 'photoshopping' something, I reply using 'ImageFXing' ;)
« Last Edit: March 02, 2010, 04:36:53 PM by hardlink »