Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: debian hardinfo benchmarks  (Read 22158 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: debian hardinfo benchmarks
« on: May 02, 2012, 11:04:16 PM »
Quote from: klx300r;691344
you must not visit this site regularly.
The facts are that the graphs should state that the X1000 results are based on only once core of the X1000's cpu.  For a real world example run a Blender demo on only one cpu and then run it with all the cpu's cores and then you will see real 'facts'


All the machines in the graph are running on one core.
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: debian hardinfo benchmarks
« Reply #1 on: May 03, 2012, 09:03:15 PM »
Quote from: klx300r;691375
the truth would be nice eh..see post 20.

@ Piru

I know you don't want to troll this way dude so tell 'the truth' on this thread and change those graphs to refelct that the X1000 is only operating on one core.


How many times must you be told: all of the machines in the graph are running on one core. If any of them were running on two cores you might have some kind of point, but they aren't, none of them. Just because you don't understand this doesn't mean Piru is "trolling".
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: debian hardinfo benchmarks
« Reply #2 on: May 03, 2012, 10:24:35 PM »
Quote from: takemehomegrandma;691460
Dual core benchmarks are pointless in an Amiga context though, so why bother? Amiga won't ever be SMP without breaking the "Amiga" in it. I would vote "aye" for doing that in future MorphOS, but my view of the OS4 community is that it's largely built on the "we are based on teh tru sources", "we are teh reel!!1!" and other mumbo jumbo statements, so I don't think it will go down just as easily for them. And of course, if you are going to cut the cord, break from the past, and start with a clean slate, why on earth would anyone be stupid enough to do it on an obscure, backwater PPC platform? Doesn't compute...

If ALL the machines are benchmarked using two cores then that's a valid comparison, but what does anyone expect? ALL the machines will simply be faster, it isn't going to magically make the X1000 change position. But like you, I wonder what is the point of doing so if the X1000 is involved? The OS the X1000 is supposedly designed for doesn't have SMP or any other sort of multi-core support, so all it will do is expose OS4 users to precisely how little of the processing power of the X1000 is utilized.

Hey I know, maybe if the benchmark suites were redesigned to take advantage of the Power of X, the onboard Xena XMOS chip, then the scales will tip! Yeah that's the ticket!  :crazy smiley: :crazy smiley:
 

Offline jorkany

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2006
  • Posts: 1009
    • Show all replies
    • http://www.amigaos4.com
Re: debian hardinfo benchmarks
« Reply #3 on: May 04, 2012, 06:18:40 PM »
Quote from: takemehomegrandma;691598
Why? The benchmark (and the results) can only be 1 thread, right?


I wonder if he would be so obsessive about unnecessary labeling if the X1000 had been a better performer?