Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: lame benchmarks (pun intended)  (Read 21912 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« on: February 02, 2012, 09:58:37 PM »
Plz use my benchmark topic to make that tests if possible so we can all ahve same bench base:

http://amigaworld.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=30008&forum=2

thank you.
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2012, 10:12:00 PM »
how bout use os4emu under MOS to compare test? so we can run the same exe on different machines?
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2012, 10:20:26 PM »
On my Peg2@1131 the wav file with lame altivec:


8.RAM Disk:> lame AKsack.wav
LAME 3.98.2 32bits (http://www.mp3dev.org/)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16537 Hz - 17071 Hz
Encoding AKsack.wav to AKsack.wav.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3
    Frame          |  CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU |    ETA
 10529/10529 (100%)|    0:22/    0:22|    0:23/    0:23|   12.095x|    0:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   kbps        MS  %     long switch short %                                  
  128.0      100.0        76.1  13.4  10.5                                    
Writing LAME Tag...done
ReplayGain: +0.5dB
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #3 on: February 02, 2012, 10:57:42 PM »
@Piru

I tryed all the lame versions on hte archive from OS4Depot and get:

for Lame-G4 : 23 secs

for lame/lameSHARED : 40 secs

So the lame G4 that was 3.98.2 intead of 3.98.4 of the other 2 compiles seems to have AltiVec enabled...
Now have to see wich version was used on X1000...

EDIT:

I tryed the lame vmx from aminet under MOS 2.7 on my Peg2@1131 and GOT:

LAME 3.98.4 32bits (http://www.mp3dev.org/)
Using polyphase lowpass filter, transition band: 16538 Hz - 17071 Hz
Encoding AKsack.wav to AKsack.wav.mp3
Encoding as 44.1 kHz j-stereo MPEG-1 Layer III (11x) 128 kbps qval=3
    Frame          |  CPU time/estim | REAL time/estim | play/CPU |    ETA
 10529/10529 (100%)|    0:24/    0:24|    0:25/    0:25|   11.077x|    0:00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   kbps        MS  %     long switch short %
  128.0      100.0        76.1  13.4  10.5
Writing LAME Tag...done
ReplayGain: +0.5dB
« Last Edit: February 02, 2012, 11:11:26 PM by Tuxedo »
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #4 on: February 02, 2012, 11:22:40 PM »
@Piru

the problem was only if the X1000 test author have used the G4 version...
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #5 on: December 25, 2017, 01:45:56 PM »
Can anyone plz add the lame test with x5000 plz?
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #6 on: December 26, 2017, 06:49:05 PM »
Quote from: kolla;834377
And Vampire? lol


Why not?
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #7 on: December 27, 2017, 08:40:43 PM »
Quote from: Nickman;834423
What is the command line for the test?


lame file.mp3
 

Offline Tuxedo

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 57
    • Show all replies
    • http://None at the moment
Re: lame benchmarks (pun intended)
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2017, 08:39:41 PM »
Quote from: Nickman;834439
That makes no sence at all too me. Doesnt Lame take an in file and output an mp3?
So what is the file to test and pack?

Is it part of some version? or on the official homepage?


Sorry mate but...
on #6 piru links the fiel to test...didnt noticed?