Opppsss..I apologize to the Windoze OS if I have insulted you in anyway..hehe..
Please, please dont take it personally..that I dont like you. Windoze is power hungry, looks like crap, not very intuitive, security leaks up the wazoo, prone to crashing..etc...shall I go on. On the PC hardware side things are awsome!!
I guess you misunderstood me..I did NOT state that owning, using and AMIGA is a waste of time..I have a few myself as well as some old Commodore stuff, been a fan/owner since the '80s. That being said..I think the MiniMig is great, I think the new A1000 replacement board is great..but I ask WHY..and have not gotten a straight answer..
Check out the thread regarding Amiga OS4 on a Mac..it was quite popular, dont you think??
I agree everyone is an individual(duh)..but we (as an Amiga community) are divided.. and its a big problem, not to mention all the A. Inc crap.
I have been on the PCB manufacuring end of things..its a huge task (re) designing a circuit board and costly, and for what?? Perhaps the designer of the new A1000 board could chime in here, as well as the MiniMig guy..
I ask a simple question WHY?
Did you
amigaksi wrote:
>The Mac thing you wrote makes absolutley no sense.. Macs are still being produced in mass..and much better than a PC or Windoze will ever be, face it.
>Sure you can get a PC cheaper, faster..but the OS is DOG WASTE so whats the point? Heck..port the Amiga OS to run on an Intel machine and I will buy one.
Just insulting an OS does not constitute a good argument. The point I guess you missed is: Like on the Amiga, the OS routines can be called along with directly using standardized hardware registers, similarly on a PC you can use the OS or bypass it and directly write code that uses the hardware (which is more standardized than a Mac). I guess an example may help-- suppose you wanted to reboot the computer when a person presses the joystick button. You can take a PC and code the following:
In AL,201h
Test AL,16
Jnz NoBoot
Mov AL,FE
Out 64h,AL
NoBoot:
Or you can find the equivalent API calls and/or BIOS calls and do the same.
>And for another thing..I did not bring up the "hobby" thing(mdivancic did above)
>Why are you glad that I stated "in my opinion"?
Because it's NOT a waste of time to many people and that's a fact. I use the Amiga for games, writing/testing external device control stuff, and used to use it for genlock video titling.
>Please list the pupose of the MiniMig, and this new A1000 board? and dont say nostalgia..cuz I get that part..Because its a HOBBY..for those who are developing these boards(just a guess). Uh..I paid$3,300 for my Mac not $10,000 on developeing A1000 replacement MB..a huge difference.
I guess someone more familiar with the manufacturing of these can give you a better cost analysis.
>My point is that these talented people, and there are more of them Im sure should really come together on a common project..say like getting the current Amiga OS..3.5, 3.9 and 4.0 running on current(new) hardware. Such as Mac or Intel...mmmm.....
Which OS does the Amiga Zany Golf run on? And what about that pac-man game that eats the workbench screen before it starts? And what about that game that scrolls the entire display like a wallpaper (as if the OS did not exist)?
>I know the truth hurts..but thats one of the big problems with this Amiga community..its divided
Truth does not hurt if you already live in it. Everyone is an individual and has his desires and that applies to all communities although if the desires are similar it makes for a better more harmonious community.