Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Which OS are the worst and the best?  (Read 11514 times)

Description:

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline AmigaMac

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2002
  • Posts: 560
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Which OS are the worst and the best?
« on: July 15, 2003, 04:06:46 AM »
Well I've had my share of experiences in the land of Operating Systems:

Worst:

DOS - My hatred for this OS dates back to my teenage years, it sucked PERIOD!

WinNT - like Wacoon said, it was not as stable as people made it out to be.

Win98 - it was more buggy than Win95!

WinXP - though probably not as bad as previous versions Windows, it's still quirky, clunky and unpredictable.

Mac OS X (10.0) - Though I like Unix based OSes, this one was just plain SLOW!

Best:

VMS - probably one of the best networking type OS out there.  It was very stable as well, it's a shame that DEC got bought out by a half-baked PC company called Compaq :-(

Solaris - This is probably the next best OS behind VMS with the same +s.  I've worked around this OS for nearly a decade now :-D

BeOS - Just a cool all-around OS that would practically turn any slow PC/Mac into a fast performing machine.  I still use this OS now.

Linux  (the RedHat distro is my most favorite) - Though a few years ago I probably wouldn't have listed this OS, I quite like it these days.  A very good and cheap alternative to the more expensive/proprietary Unix Oses out there.

Mac OS X (10.1 and up) - though I was not exactly happy with the intitial release of OS X, I have been a satisfied user since the release of 10.1 and I am looking forward to Panther's release soon.

AOS - what's not to like?  :-P  :-D  ;-)