Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Classic VS NG  (Read 14558 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kickstart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 1057
    • Show all replies
Re: Classic VS NG
« on: April 08, 2014, 04:21:33 PM »
"classic" better know as real amigas= all

sams and x1000 "ng" better know as amiga-like= expensive harware for emulate real amiga software with a reasonable browser
a1200 060
 

Offline kickstart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 1057
    • Show all replies
Re: Classic VS NG
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2014, 10:33:04 PM »
Quote from: danwood;762201
"NG" doesn't just mean OS4, there are several ways to get a very similar (if not better) "NG" Amiga experience for many times less money than the X1000 or Sams - MorphOS or AROS have already been mentioned in this thread and make more sense for a user on a budget or who doesn't need a specific element that only OS4 offers.


Yes, aros is a good idea but need more time to advance, morphos is faster than amigaos4, more compatible and with better and cheap hardware.
a1200 060
 

Offline kickstart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 1057
    • Show all replies
Re: Classic VS NG
« Reply #2 on: April 08, 2014, 10:34:59 PM »
Quote from: Fransexy_;762214
Why that hate towards amigaos4? have you a childhood trauma because AmigaOS4 raped you when you were a child or what?


The only trauma is to see your nickname and avatar.
a1200 060
 

Offline kickstart

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2006
  • Posts: 1057
    • Show all replies
Re: Classic VS NG
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 02:28:09 AM »
Quote from: TheMagicM;762226
NG = OS4 and MorphOS..

If you want to add AROS or whatever to the list..then do so..just keep this damn thread clean.  Jesus Christ..first Linux vs the world and now this...again.


Then the rule is talk just following your rules? No one say nothing wrong.
a1200 060