Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: X-Surf 100 - Best TCP/IP for Speed?  (Read 18557 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: X-Surf 100 - Best TCP/IP for Speed?
« on: October 19, 2013, 07:45:26 PM »
Quote from: olsen;750531
If you select a specific DNS server pair in AmiTCP then this is what will be used, regardless of what the router wants to use. Your ISP may or may not manipulate outbound DNS queries and the corresponding results. It's technically possible, and if you're living in the UK, it might actually happen.


I have actually come across some routers which defy this rule.  Some older Engenius routers (I stopped using the damned things, so I cannot speak about newer units,) some Belkin, and a couple of D-Links were culprits in breaking Windows Server DNS services.  I was able to show that the routers were intercepting DNS packets.  I some cases the inbound was blocked, forcing the server to use the router for DNS.  In other cases, outbound DNS packets were being usurped, and this caused huge issues with EDNS queries as none of these routers support EDNS so queries would be delayed, broken in sequence, or in most testing simply dropped.

It's easier to tell what's happening with your queries if you have access to an outside DNS server's logs.  But it's not impossible otherwise.
 

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: X-Surf 100 - Best TCP/IP for Speed?
« Reply #1 on: October 24, 2013, 03:42:08 PM »
Quote from: olsen;751014
The first is easy enough. Before you start Roadshow, enter the following command in the shell: RoadshowControl set tcp.mssdflt = 1500

You can make this tweak permanent with this command, entered in the shell: RoadshowControl save set tcp.mssdflt = 1500

The default for this setting is 512 bytes, by the way. Which is how this used to be in 1995's Internet.


Could this method be used to set up jumbo frames?  How would Roadshow, or a 50MHz 68060 Amiga, react to frames up to 9000 bytes?
 

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: X-Surf 100 - Best TCP/IP for Speed?
« Reply #2 on: October 25, 2013, 04:56:12 AM »
Quote from: matt3k;751061
Interesting point, is it possible my GB Network is the culprit?  I suppose  could use a cross over cable for testing.

I'm using all Intellinet Switches and Router, don't know of any issue with them.


I have good results with Intellinet switches.  I was running a gigabit switch on the back-end of my virtualization platform on which I provide hosting.  That said, I have never had one fail full-out, rather they tend to die a little piece at a time.
 

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: X-Surf 100 - Best TCP/IP for Speed?
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2016, 04:23:45 PM »
10Mb/s is roughly 1MB/s, so 900k BYTES per second is really not bad.