Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: Server - Solaris or Linux  (Read 3166 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Server - Solaris or Linux
« on: May 06, 2008, 08:22:59 PM »
I prefer Solaris, myself.  It's free for personal or education use, or you can use OpenSolaris (I don't have experience with the later.)

If you do get Solaris, check out SunFreeWare (http://sunfreeware.com) for some good packages.

I run my servers on them, privately and professionally, and have done so for almost 10 years.  I have worked with various distros of Linux, some I liked and some I hated, none-the-less I still prefer Solaris.
 

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Server - Solaris or Linux
« Reply #1 on: May 06, 2008, 10:52:30 PM »
Quote

webmany wrote:
While ZFS is nice, the requirements to run a stableish system are rather high.  Last time I looked it was 2GB ram and a 64Bit CPU.


I've seen this in regards to the ZFS port for Linux, but not specifically for Solaris 10.  But I can imagine it would definitely help.

In Solaris 8 and 9, I use UFS with logging on in vfstab, and I have yet to suffer a damaged file system.  My test installation of Solaris 10 puts UFS in logging mode automatically.
 

Offline LoadWB

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 2901
  • Country: 00
    • Show all replies
Re: Server - Solaris or Linux
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2008, 02:23:09 AM »
Quote

TheMagicM wrote:
for such a simplistic server I'd run Linux.  Solaris IMO is much more secure than Linux, equal or better stability.  Wider  range of hardware is supported under Linux.   More software available under Linux.  All in all in your application I think Linux would be the better decision.


I can dig this.  Some Linux distros out-of-the-box (OOB) are ready to roll as file servers, and it can be much more friendly with hardware.

But the question here is, why not just use a USB NAS device?  D-Link, Linksys, Buffalo... don't they make the server part for around $100, then you just attach your external hard drive and viola.  Or are you looking for a little internal admin xp?

That's why I built my Solaris 8/x86 box.  400MHz AMD K6-III+, 128MB RAM, Intel NIC, Matrox PCI video.  Runs Bind as a cache and internal IP resolution, native DHCP, and Sendmail.  Same specs should run most Linux distros nicely.

With a Linux box, you could also take a Windows-formatted hard drive with a butt-load of your files and slap it in the box -- it can read FAT32, and I believe the NTFS is mature at this point.