Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Author Topic: ADPro vs. ImageFX  (Read 15876 times)

Description:

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline save2600

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3261
  • Country: us
    • Show all replies
Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« on: March 15, 2010, 04:28:59 PM »
Speaking of relevancy and after all these years, I think it's great (entertaining at the least) to actually use or read about others using "old" software. I'm with a a few here when I say it doesn't matter how old something is. If that were the case, most of us may as well have been put out to pasture after so many cycles. lol

Joking aside, I'm about to delve a little deeper into the ImageFX program, just for the fun of it. Will it or my 060 equipped A2500 handle a 25mb RAW file from my DSLR? My 2.1ghz G5 even chokes and gags a little with 'em! I'm not even going to try to edit a photo that large on an Amiga. lol  BUT... whether or not someone uses their Amiga's for commercial gain or entertainment purposes - it's all the same. We need to remember that the computer is just a machine and there's no reason to scoff at how old it or its software is. If it still works - use it!

Same could be said about hi-fi gear, furniture, appliances - whatever. Personally, I've gotten into this pattern of reading an AmigaWorld or Amazing Computing issue right before bed (pretty much own both subscriptions in their entirety) and am sort of "re-living" the days of the Amiga through reading. It's been a lot of fun and I'm learning new things about my computers every day. Amiga is compelling that way at least. Can't imagine ever picking up an old MacWorld or Byte magazine ('cept the one that featured the A3000) and getting all nostalgic over either of those platforms  ;)

BTW: Finally got the right adapter so I can use my IBM Model M keyboard with my Mac....  :P  
She's old, heavy and loud. Best damn keyboard I've ever used, but if she were a woman, I'd have ditched her long ago.  lmao
« Last Edit: March 15, 2010, 04:38:11 PM by save2600 »
 

Offline save2600

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Join Date: Jul 2006
  • Posts: 3261
  • Country: us
    • Show all replies
Re: ADPro vs. ImageFX
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2010, 05:12:05 PM »
Quote from: T3000;547690
Providing of course you don't expect it to perform beyond the capabilities of the machine and software. Typical graphic image file resolutions were around 1meg in size at the time.
Is there a RAW file loader for Ifx?
The 25mg file size might be pushing things especially if the G5 chokes. GigaMem might help Think that's what it's called, uses the HD for memory. Would be interesting to try...


I'm not positive yet if ImageFX does RAW... but I did just read in a mid 90's mag that one of those programs did. I discovered that 'RAW' isn't exactly a true "standard" anyway. I use Pentax equipment and had to wait for iPhoto to include a special RAW plug-in for my camera about 5 years ago.

But yeah, for messing around on the Miggy, I'll be uploading 1.3-4mp images to her. No worries there. lol