Man, you are truly delusional.
Calm down an look at your work.
Then look at MUI.
Lookat your documentation,
look at MUI documentation.
Now tell me you havent made a MUI-clone,
called it your own invention, copy-pasted
the documentation, only replaced occourences of "MUI" with "Feelin", renamed methods with "F_" instead of "MUI_", And YES, removed BOOPSI
and replaced it with something similar.
And DONT tell me to read the documantation,
or that I just look at the pictures, or that I am drunk, or anything like that. I have {bleep}ing
read your documentation, looked at your examples (also from MUI btw), and coded a bunch of stuff with MUI.
And NO, I dont have a problem with you reimplementing MUI.
I have a problem with you copy-pasting the documentation (documentation,autodocs)
withiout a single notice
pretending you did it yourself.
I have a problem with you calling MUI crap.
Also, I dont see what the hell Feelin actually
improves on compared to MUI, besides a few
details that doesn really make that much difference in
the end anyway. maybe if it was actually compatible with MUI.
And the argument that you have just made it look like MUI to make MUI-programmers more easily
start programming for it is also bull. It soesnt make it easier to code for, but instead the programmer thinks he is coding MUI, but it doesnt work because of many small incompatibilities,
the biggest beeing the basic way methods are called. If you want to create something revolutionary then give it its own API instead.
